I’m often asked how I keep up with events and a list of news sources for
what I read.
Before I provide my list, the primary quality is an insatiable curiosity
about current events and a thirst to read. I prefer reading over television and
radio because I can go at my own pace, stop and reread something that didn’t
quite make sense, evaluate the source and look for bias in the author, and
pause to think about what’s being said.
Non-print media doesn’t provide that opportunity. The audience is forced
to go at the pace of the newscast, can’t pause to think, can’t go back to make
sure they heard an item correctly, and therefore often absorb the bias of the
reporter without realizing it.
Most of my reading is done on the Internet. I use mostly free sources
because media companies have not figured out how a business model that makes
economic sense to consumers. For example, my hometown newspaper began their
paywall by asking for $12.95 a month for internet access. For another dollar a
month, they will drive by my house every morning and throw a traditional
ink-on-paper newspaper in my driveway.
Most people think like me: It costs much more than one dollar for ink,
paper, power to run the printing press, and vehicle expenses for that traditional
newspaper. The publisher is trying to rip off consumers and I refuse to comply.
That’s why I was delighted when the Washington Post offered internet
access for $20 a year. That’s a deal I can accept. I would be willing to
subscribe to another four or five sources at that rate. If newspapers would
rethink their offers, they could increase revenue from the internet immensely.
Now my list:
1.
Washington Post online as described above. I
have access to everything the paper offers and prints.
2.
Local TV and news radio internet sites. The
stories are concise and mostly help me keep up with events in my area.
3.
Newsola: an internet news aggregator that draws
stories from Google News. Size and color show importance and newness of the
items as well as categorize items into world, nation, financial, entertainment,
and technology.
4.
Worldcrunch: when U.S. media do not report
events in other parts of the world that interest me. Worldcrunch is an
aggregator from foreign media sources.
5.
Newsmax magazine.
6.
Email lists. These change from time to time
depending on the importance of their content and the level of bias in the
source. I do not mind a slant or spin; I expect it. This is why I read from
liberal and conservative newsletters. With input from all sides, I evaluate the
information, tease out the truth, and come to my own conclusions. However, over
time email newsletters tend to deteriorate. Either the frequency is interrupted
and delivery becomes erratic or the author begins to force his perspective onto
every item. When the newsletter makes judgments about the news based on whether
the author approves of the person, not the actions of the person, it has
crossed a line and I drop it.
7.
Radio news that I hear as I drive to and from
work.
8.
Yahoo/ATT home page. Yahoo may be second-rate as
a search engine, but its other services are first rate. It’s a good place for
keeping up with general events.
I haven’t tried Buzzfeed because I think of it as a humor site. Most of
my interaction with Buzzfeed comes from postings on Facebook. However, I have
heard that it has built itself into a reputable site for authentic news. I will
have to check it out and maybe add it to my list.
I may have a few others, but my attention to them is infrequent enough
that they do not come to mind. If I remember one, I will amend this post.
What are your sources? Put them in the comments and I’ll check them out.
No comments:
Post a Comment