It reads like a murder mystery,
this ongoing saga of the young man without a moral compass. The mystery is why
Florida State University decided to act on a minor misdemeanor, a very typical
young man stunt of shouting something, we don’t know what but its nature was
vulgar and directed toward females, based upon an internet meme traveling among
the social media of college-aged students.
Previously, FSU went with the
decision of the local State’s Attorney’s Office that as there wasn’t enough
evidence to support prosecution of a young woman’s claim of rape, there was no
need for the University to conduct an investigation into the conduct of Winston
in that incident.
Only when the Feds got interested
under Title IX did the University feel the need for a pretense that they would
do something. This is FSU, remember, and Jameis Winston is not the first
athlete whose questionable behavior was ignored as long as the Garnet and Gold
won football games.
Is it a case that (wink, wink) sexual
escapades are part of the make-up of muscle-bound, virile, testosterone-fueled
young male athletes who smash heads on a grass-covered field in the afternoon
and then seek a different conquest at night? Everyone remembers the wild oats
of their youth or the wild oats as they wished it had been?
Notice the male oriented nature of
that paragraph. Women must have a very different orientation or why, long ago,
in my college days did two women take out a personal ad in the campus newspaper
calling out the winning quarterback, “Hey, (name deleted), you had one pass
that failed Saturday night!”
The incident in the supermarket
continued the bad press just when FSU could hope that the attention would fade
away. Again we had excuses: he forgot to pay, he had a moment of “youthful
ignorance.” (His words.)
In this case, he received a civil
citation to divert the case from criminal court, performed community service
(he had seven days to do so; one must wonder how many hours were assigned),
reimbursed the store, and served a suspension from the baseball team.
But there were no football
penalties. That might cost victories.
Until now. Jameis Winston was
suspended for one game, which was first a half-game suspension until media
condemnation resulted in FSU making the punishment a full game.
Winston took the reprimand to
heart. So much so that he was seen in full uniform taking snaps and throwing
passes during the pre-game practice.
The coach ordered him off the
field. He returned for the game wearing his jersey and sweatpants.
Some suspension. Really, FSU?
Seriously?
At a minimum, he should have been
banned from the stadium. Allowing him to stand on the sidelines, to be there
should the back-up falter as a visual I-told-you-that-you-can’t-afford-to-play-without-me,
negated any effect upon him.
A more effective punishment would
have been to mandate him to attend classes about showing proper respect to
women and then taking one hour of practice time for the entire team to listen
to him share what he learned. That would sanction not only the quarterback, but
the entire program that fosters a culture of tolerance toward the misconduct of
its players.
Similarly, he could have been
ordered to attend counseling sessions for one hour every week at a time that
would cause him to miss practice. The counseling would help him to find his
motivation for his behavior and attitudes as well as to realize that the NFL
will not want him if this is what he brings to the professional gridiron. They
have enough troubles of their own.
Jameis Winston in The Crime Upon
the Table. The mystery is why a major university shows no remorse for the
culture it encourages.